93ps or 105ps
Moderator: Forum Moderators
-
Semproxion
- Rovertech Kiloposter
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:10 am
- feedback: 1376501
-
sharky
- RT GOD
- Posts: 7158
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:38 pm
- feedback: 203651
- Location: north devon - oooooaaarr!
- Contact:
1 is 8v and 1 is 16v possibly?


Chris - 200ViT, MGZR 120 and Focus Estate
MSN= sharky620ti@hotmail.com
My feedback http://www.rt2468abcd.r8technology.co.uk/viewtopi ... 651#203651
-
sharky
- RT GOD
- Posts: 7158
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:38 pm
- feedback: 203651
- Location: north devon - oooooaaarr!
- Contact:
yeah, or thatReef wrote:(Not knowing, I'm assuming it's a K-series engine)
I believe the difference comes from whether you engine is SPi (Single point injection) or MPi (Multi-point)
Multi-points are normally easy to spot as they have a rail of 4 injectors


Chris - 200ViT, MGZR 120 and Focus Estate
MSN= sharky620ti@hotmail.com
My feedback http://www.rt2468abcd.r8technology.co.uk/viewtopi ... 651#203651
-
Stevo135+
- RT BiKiloPoster
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 12:05 am
- feedback: 1299767
- Location: West Mids
95ps 1400 K-series engines have not been made since about 96 i think. Your IL will either be a 103ps engine (all have MPI), or it could be a restricted 84ps version, with the only difference being the throttle cable and throttle body as far as i know.
Most 8v 1.4K's were SPI, but the last Rover 100's were MPI, still 75ps, and indeed all Rover 200/25's are MPI when fitted with the 8v engine too.
Most 8v 1.4K's were SPI, but the last Rover 100's were MPI, still 75ps, and indeed all Rover 200/25's are MPI when fitted with the 8v engine too.
-
ross_lewis
- Rovertech Kiloposter
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Solihull
incorrect! they made the 'low power' 1.4's right up until rover went bump, the only way you will know is the difference between throttle bodies, which was mentioned in an earlier reply to the postStevo135+ wrote:95ps 1400 K-series engines have not been made since about 96 i think. Your IL will either be a 103ps engine (all have MPI), or it could be a restricted 84ps version, with the only difference being the throttle cable and throttle body as far as i know.
Most 8v 1.4K's were SPI, but the last Rover 100's were MPI, still 75ps, and indeed all Rover 200/25's are MPI when fitted with the 8v engine too.
Ross
Mk2 Golf GTI 1.8 (20vt) 
-
ti or not ti
- Rovertech Kiloposter
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- feedback: 1051324
- Location: Here there and everywhere.. but mostly Coventry!
-
Stevo135+
- RT BiKiloPoster
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 12:05 am
- feedback: 1299767
- Location: West Mids
The R25 was all 16v engine's im fairly certain. The 95ps engine was used up to 96, and had SPI injection. MGR did make a reduced power 1.4k right up to the end, but this was a restricted 103ps engine, hence the different throttle body and cable.
One more thing to confuse people further, is that the 1.1 8v and the 1.4 8v engines, used for a short time in the R200 mk3, were not carried over to the R25, but they used a 75ps 1.1 16v engine instead to replace both 8v units. Every K-series engine ever used in the R200 mk3, and R25's has been fitted with multipoint injection though!
One more thing to confuse people further, is that the 1.1 8v and the 1.4 8v engines, used for a short time in the R200 mk3, were not carried over to the R25, but they used a 75ps 1.1 16v engine instead to replace both 8v units. Every K-series engine ever used in the R200 mk3, and R25's has been fitted with multipoint injection though!
I'm pretty sure the iL would not have had the restricted throttle body. As far as I am aware the restricted throttle body was only fitted to the 25 i and special editions.
I've fitted the 48mm unrestricted throttle body to my 2000 25i and its made a big difference..
Steve
I've fitted the 48mm unrestricted throttle body to my 2000 25i and its made a big difference..
Steve
Your mind is like a parachute, it works best when its open!!

