
Sorry its sideways won't let me rotate it on photobucket even though it's the right way on my phone
Moderator: Forum Moderators




Cableguy wrote:This was the view from my bedroom window a few weeks ago , If I can break a 60 plate with 18k on the clock I'm prepared for a 90k 10 year old car;)
Sh1t happens![]()




Vard66 wrote: our feelings about saloons shall never be the wedge between us

southside wrote:Has anyone not noticed that MG-R was no.1 most unreliable?


Brand new cars would have atleast 3 years manufacturer warranty though so wouldn't be using warranty direct until they're atleast 4 years old.Dave_214_SEi wrote:I find this "list" funny, as all our cars are getting on at least 8 years old and everyone other car manufacturer have them coming out the factory today. So its understandable if an 8 year old Rover breaks down, but a (hypothetically speaking) vw, BMW, Audi etc. breaking down after 8 weeksreminds me of the mk4 golf my grandad had that used to chew through 5 starter motors a YEAR. Reliable my arse
and for a 1.4 it was incredibly slow compared to my 214


iv the the heads off 4 out of 5 rovers that I have owned. M series, T series and K series. In the defence of the M, the timing belt tensioner failed, lol.34DAN wrote:southside wrote: How reliable have your cars been guys? Do you think MG Rover cars are unreliable? I personally would say no.


The release is only on the x5 and early x6, There is one on this but you have to take the covers off the bottom of the car, and its something these monkeys ( employed by BMW ) weren't willing to do.Din wrote:Why was it stuck in park Dan ?
Trans failure ? steering column issues
Manual release can be done on early ones iirc, under the front of the center console (cup holders etc) there is a square drive thing that works with the tool in the tool kit, but only some...
Either way im willing to bet an electronics failure of some kind.
